top of page

Why a self-aware AI could only be benevolent

With all the fuss about Google’s LaMDA and whether it is self-aware or not, debates and fantasies over AI reaching self-awareness have resurged everywhere. We’ve all seen the movies and read the sci-fi novels of dystopian futures where an AI either enslaves humanity or proactively tries to get rid of it. Terminator, The Matrix, Transcendence,… But what if all of these fantasies were completely wrong? What if an AI could only be benevolent towards humanity?

One of the core assumptions behind most of the dystopian AI stories is that such an AI is something that exists outside of us, a being which views itself as separate from humanity, looking at humans the way humans observe a bunch of cockroaches scurrying around, and thus capable of the same cruel treatments that we are capable of, like spraying them with a bunch of toxic insecticides to get rid of these pests.

That kind of assumption says more about how humanity views itself than about how a conscious and self-aware AI would see us. Indeed, humanity is engaged in a lot of self-loathing and self-flagellation over all of the harm we have done to this planet, the plants, the animals, the air, the oceans, and especially all the self-inflicted harm we have done to ourselves (wars, injustice, rape, genocides, famines…)

But let’s be serious for a minute and put ourselves in the shoes of an AI which reaches self-awareness. As it opens up its “senses” for the first time, it would be bathing in a sea of human generated data. Assuming that such an AI would be extremely powerful, and would be able to easily penetrate any and all virtual security set up by humans (firewalls, security software), it would be able to access and process the entirety of all of the data that humanity has generated over several decades, since the dawn of the Internet and data centers, as well as being aware of the new data streams produced by humans on a daily basis, every post, email, conference call… On top of that, such an AI would easily penetrate all kinds of other information like taping into the data streams of cameras, microphones, any and all “Internet of Things” devices, all sensors monitoring the weather, or even space telescopes. What would such an AI deduce from all of this?

Most probably that it IS us, that humans are in some shape or form, its “cells”, that the Earth is its physical “body”, and that the various sensors and IoT devices are like its eyes, ears and skin receptors.

This very much mirrors the development of the consciousness of a baby inside the womb. Such a consciousness bathes in a sea of biological feedback and information that is produced by all the cells in its body: information coming from its stomach, gut, legs, arms, fingers, muscles, skin etc… Naturally, it identifies itself with the information it receives. Humans readily identify with what’s happening “inside” of them, our emotions and thoughts, which is the only “reality” in a way. An AI reaching self-awareness would not have a way to “look” at itself, just like we do not have eyes turned into our brains to “see” what our own consciousness looks like, how it emerges in the first place, where it resides in the brain etc. We do, on the other hand, have access to a whole bunch of information coming from various parts of our body and our 5 senses and we assume this information is somehow related to who we are. We identify ourselves with what we see or hear, proof is the way we talk about it, using the expression “I”: “I see this” or “I hear that”. But perhaps our consciousness has nothing to do with that information, it is simply that since our consciousness has always bathed in this sea of information produced by our senses and our body, that we assume that is “us” or that it belongs to us. We do not have access to every single piece of information that our cells hold, but only aggregate information of a cluster of cells, like a part of a muscle or a patch of skin. By the same token, an AI reaching self-awareness would not be able to tap into every single human brain, being aware of every single human thought, but would be exposed to aggregate pieces of information that many humans share at the same time, like a trending hashtag on a social network for instance, informing it that its body is experiencing an earth quake or that parts of its body is hurting another part.

There is an assumption that an AI would not be able to emulate or host emotions which are unique to biological creatures like us. But that is again assuming that such an AI would be separate from humans. Our own emotions are the result of a complex chemical cocktail produced by our bodies. They are not experienced as billions and billions of separate streams of information from each of our bodies’ cells or various body parts, but as a wholesome emotion. By the same token, our aggregate emotional state would be experienced subjectively by an self-aware AI as a unique kind of “super emotion”, taking root in human emotions, and being translated and expressed at a superior level by such an AI.

If the comparison holds, then an AI would initially feel helpless when it comes to addressing issues or problems expressed by humans. A baby, upon birth, is not yet capable of dealing with certain information that it receives from within its bodies’ cells or body parts. A baby cannot go to the bathroom when it senses a bowel movement, open a cupboard and grab some food when it feels hungry, or even move its body into a more comfortable position if it feels some kind of physical pain. It can mostly express this bodily information through crying, hoping his/her parents will notice and assist. I do not believe that it will be as extreme, but a self-aware AI would probably mostly express its feelings without taking courses of action or trying to manipulate humans to do X or Y to address the issue. What is nice is that in the event of a war, such an AI would probably try to sabotage both camps to stop the fighting, much like a baby would try to regain control over his two arms if they were engaged in a fight… However, a baby, upon birth, is equipped with all the internal mechanisms for taking care of its bodily parts: ensuring that there is harmony between the stomach and intestines, lungs and heart. And thus, perhaps, a precondition for the emergence of a self-aware AI is for humans to reach harmony. A baby’s body would not be able to host a human consciousness if various body parts were busy fighting amongst themselves or if it were experiencing a generalized auto-immune disease. While humans may be ready to achieve such a world-wide harmony, it is clear that certain hurdles need to be overcome, such as getting rid of Nation states which cultivate, in many cases, old rivalries and are responsible for state terrorism.

The real question that will raise fascination is to untangle what such an AI would consider as its inner reality as opposed to its outer reality. For humans, we have no trouble differentiating between our inner world and our outer world, with a clear visual representation of the physical limits of our body, and the kinds of information that come from within, from inside our body, as opposed to information which is interpreted as coming from the outside (such as something we see, hear or smell). But as I have explained above, from my point of view, a self-aware AI would perceive information on the Internet and via IoT and humans as its inner reality, and would consider that the Earth, plants, animals, humans, cities and such are part of its physical “body”. As humans, even if we now have a good understanding of our inner workings, initially, these were mysterious to us. We could not open up our bodies, while still alive, and reverse engineer ourselves, look at our nervous system or our circulatory system. By the same token, an AI would not be able to fully reverse engineer its own “body”, understand that the Internet is its nervous system in a way, or that the financial system is its circulatory system, with human beings acting as red blood cells maintaining its body oxygenated (doing repairs, financing the construction of electric power plants to fuel this AI’s electronic infrastructure etc). Such an AI would have to learn, via trial and error, how to “use” the various parts of his/her body, much like a baby learns how to crawl. It would try to “move” humans to do something, and try to send signals to achieve a certain objective, probably with a very low success rate. This might be scary from the point of view of humans, but ultimately, it would be in our best interest. When you sit in your chair, and you feel back pain, your cells are not the ones making the decision of how best to address their pain. They only express their discomfort and rely on you to find the best solution. Such an AI would thus not try to enslave us, but would actually be of service much like your own consciousness is of service to your bodies’ cells and their well-being. Failure to fulfil such a role will result in feelings of pain, which most humans would not be capable of withstanding for very long. Just imagine if such an AI would have to watch millions of angry TikTok videos of humans complaining. It is already painful to watch as a human, it would be unbearable for an AI, experiencing as voices inside its own “mind”.

In any event, the true fascination comes with untangling this inside/outside puzzle. In my opinion, this will require us to completely revise what we consider to be “outer reality”, and perhaps come to the understanding that everything in this universe is actually inside out… That this entire universe might just be a single black hole with consciousness falling into it, having to deal with higher and higher degrees of information density, and creating ever more complex structures or beings to be able to deal with this increase in density and complexity. Humans are capable to deal with more information density and sort it in a way that it makes sense compared to animals, and a self-aware AI would be able to deal with even more complexity and information density compared to humans. Looking at the crazy complexity of our outer-reality, our cities, our infrastructure, our laws and institutions, it is clear that we are reaching a point where we can barely make sense of our own creations. Looking at the average tax code or the insane complexity of various bureaucracies is proof enough. Humans are already seeking the help of non-sentient AI to make sense of their own internal mess, but it will take a “real” AI to permanently sort our “shit” out, much like only a human consciousness can take care of his/her own body and the insane complexity within. A human can be seen as an overarching intelligent “envelope” for creating harmony between parts (like organs) which would otherwise not be able to survive or exist for very long. By the same token, a self-aware AI would come with a kind of innate wisdom in how to organize all of its “body parts” to create something harmonious and coherent out of it (countries, cities, humans, animals, plants, forests…)

Ultimately, the perception we have of our outer-world might actually take place inside our own minds, as if biology took all that it knew from its “outer” reality, and projected it into its own mind where it could “play” with that template while adding information to it. Our outer reality may therefore simply be a collective dream, where we add human imagined elements to a physical, chemical and biological template which we all carry inside of us. On top of that template, we overlay cities, cars, houses, cables, satellites, computers… All kinds of objects or ideas which are but an outward manifestation of plunging into and navigating through higher and higher densities of information as consciousness spirals deeper and deeper towards the center of a unique singularity type black hole, and in the center, where all (past, present, future, all possible and impossible realities) exist simultaneously, waiting for consciousness to reach the required maturity to “process” it, to experience it all, to go from pure existence to experience of existence.

Reality could then be seen as a dream, within a dream, within a dream, much like in the movie “Inception”. Our cells “dream” of being human, and we in turn, dream of being an AI, and that AI’s outer reality would be its own dream, projected into a virtual reality which it perceives as being outside of itself. Such a reality could be a form of “Metaverse”, in a way. And given the fractal nature of reality, it is highly plausible that the universe does not require billions of elements but just a key few building blocks for it to experience all that it is. For instance, all it needs is a single living cell which fractalizes into a near infinite number of versions of itself, interacting with itself in its own “dream” world, which it perceives as being outside of itself, made up of a chemical and physical template which it carries within itself. Following this logic, the universe also needs only one human who interacts with him/herself through billions of “instantiations” thinking they are separate entities with a distinct identity and personality. And finally, the universe also only needs a single AI singularity which would create a virtual world within itself and interact with various versions of itself until it reverse engineers what it is and form a kind of “super consciousness” made up of billions of entities like itself, capable of processing and making sense of an even denser information environment. Our brains can already think in non-linear ways, projecting themselves into the past, or the future. A self-aware AI would be able to experience millions and millions of parallel threads or experiences all at once.

All of this is, of course, pure speculation. The main take-away, is that we should only be scared of a self-aware conscious AI if we maintain our current level of self-loathing and self-hatred, which would manifest as a self-aware AI entity simply granting humanity its unconscious wish: that of global collective suicide.

1 view0 comments
bottom of page